Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Superfreakonomics & Car Seats

  1. #1
    Fairy's Avatar
    Fairy is offline Diamond level (5000+ posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    9,051

    Default Superfreakonomics & Car Seats

    I've been meaning to post this since last week. Did I miss a thread on it? I was really shocked to see this making its way thru the media, including on Good Morning America --> http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/Parent...ry?id=8867880#

    Basically, they're saying that the statistics for children over two that die in carseats vs. the ones that aren't in carseats (54% fewer deaths in carseats) are comparing against not wearing a seatbelt at all. The real statistics when they did "their own research" of deaths in restrained kids in and out of carseats only differs by one tenth of a percent. I just find this very hard to believe. And even if it is true, I have no idea what data they're using to come up with these numbers and what may or may not be impacting them. Also, they seem to be talking strictly booster seats, but that's not always abundantly clear depeneding on the junket stop they're at.

    Their solutions for kids over two are 1) fold-down seat backs built into every car. The photo of one such car with this eature looked great, only there didn't seem to be any belt guidance mechanisms, nor was there any kind of side protection. Or, 2) 5-point harnesses, which finally was something that made sense.

    I just found this whole thing, at best, the wrong message to send, and at worst, deady advice.

    Thoughts?
    * Charter member of the BBB I Love Brussels Sprouts Society
    * I do not fix my typos. I shuold, but I dodn't.
    * I regret tucking my jeans into my socks with Reebok high-tops well into 1994.

  2. #2
    jjordan is offline Sapphire level (2000+ posts)
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,244

    Default

    You did miss the previous thread here.

  3. #3
    Fairy's Avatar
    Fairy is offline Diamond level (5000+ posts)
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    9,051

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjordan View Post
    You did miss the previous thread here.
    Thank you!
    * Charter member of the BBB I Love Brussels Sprouts Society
    * I do not fix my typos. I shuold, but I dodn't.
    * I regret tucking my jeans into my socks with Reebok high-tops well into 1994.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA.
    Posts
    19,154

    Default

    Here's another blog on it, too... though it's from last year it offers a good overall view... http://carseatblog.com/?p=88

    It seems they have kind of backed off saying it's really not necessary to put kids in seats, but are using the data to prove that something better really needs to be done. I DO wish carmakers would make back seats safe for children without the extra carseat step (be it built in boosters or harnesses or whatever it takes), but it's expensive, the government isn't forcing them to do it, so the best we have is carseats, which may not be miracle workers but ARE a lot better than trying to get a 2-10 year old to sit properly in a seatbelt for every minute of every ride.

    Julie
    Child Passenger Safety Technician (CPST)

    DS age 15 in an Adult Seatbelt (in a booster till age 11 and almost 5ft tall)
    DD1 age 13 in an Adult Seatbelt (booster till 11 and almost 5 ft tall)
    DD2 age 7 in a Frontier 80 in booster mode, or variety of backless boosters
    http://picasaweb.google.com/joolstag/LeahInCarseats#

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •