My DD1 is 7.5, so she and her peers are fast approaching the age where our state's law no longer requires booster. Lately, I'm seeing some parents take away their DC's boosters right after they turn 8. In my area, extended harnessing, extended rear facing, etc are not terribly uncommon, but I'm noticing that boostering much past 8 is.
Today I posted a link on my FB page from "Car Seats for the Littles" explaining about the Five Step Test and why many (most) kids are not ready to ride with a seat belt only on their 8th birthday. (Here's the link if anyone's interested http://csftl.org/boosters-are-for-very-big-kids/). I made a comment to the effect of "Thought this was an interesting read since so many of us have kids approaching age 8." Now, like the good BBBer that I am this was hardly new information for me, but basically I played it off like it was something new I had just learned in hopes of spreading information without calling anyone out!
I got some positive feedback, but one comment to the effect of "This article doesn't present any data. I haven't seen any evidence that there are differences among child restraint systems for older children." Which made me wonder--IS there actually data behind this recommendation, or am I just drinking the BBB kool-aid?
If there is a really scientifically rigorous study I could cite, I'd like to do so. I'm hoping for something pretty solid though--the commenter is an Ivy League educated scientist, and I really don't have it in me to get into a debate on FB a potentially flawed experimental design!!
Thanks!