PDA

View Full Version : AP story: Chemicals in baby products raise concern



citymama
02-04-2008, 02:34 AM
As if we didn't have enough things to worry about - groan. This new study points to the risks from chemicals in some baby shampoos, lotions and soaps...unfortunately, it doesn't name any names. I suspect there will be follow-up studies and articles which might be more specific.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080204/ap_on_he_me/baby_products_chemicals

Chemicals in baby products raise concern

By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer

CHICAGO - Baby shampoos, lotions and powders may expose infants to chemicals that have been linked with possible reproductive problems, a small study suggests.

The chemicals, called phthalates, are found in many ordinary products including cosmetics, toys, vinyl flooring and medical supplies. They are used to stabilize fragrances and make plastics flexible.

In the study, they were found in elevated levels in the urine of babies who'd been recently shampooed, powdered or lotioned with baby products.

Phthalates (pronounced thowl-ates) are under attack by some environmental advocacy groups, but experts are uncertain what dangers, if any, they might pose. The federal government doesn't limit their use, although California and some countries have restricted their use.

Animal studies have suggested that phthalates can cause reproductive birth defects and some activists believe they may cause reproductive problems in boys and early puberty in girls.

Rigorous scientific evidence in human studies is lacking. The current study offers no direct evidence that products the infants used contained phthalates, and no evidence that the chemicals in the babies' urine caused any harm. Still, the results worried environmental groups that support restrictions on these chemicals.

"There is an obvious need for laws that force the beauty industry to clean up its act," said Stacy Malkan of Health Care Without Harm.

The study's lead author, Dr. Sheela Sathyanarayana, a University of Washington pediatrician, said, "The bottom line is that these chemicals likely do exist in products that we're commonly using on our children and they potentially could cause health effects."

Babies don't usually need special lotions and powders, and water alone or shampoo in very small amounts is generally enough to clean infant hair, Sathyanarayana said.

Concerned parents can seek products labeled "phthalate-free," or check labels for common phthalates, including DEP and DEHP.

But the chemicals often don't appear on product labels. That's because retail products aren't required to list individual ingredients of fragrances, which are a common phthalate source.

The Food and Drug Administration "has no compelling evidence that phthalates pose a safety risk when used in cosmetics," spokeswoman Stephanie Kwisnek said. "Should new data emerge, we will inform the public as well as the industry."

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says the health effects in humans are uncertain.

"Although several studies in people have explored possible associations with developmental and reproductive outcomes (semen quality, genital development in boys, shortened pregnancy, and premature breast development in young girls), more research is needed," a 2005 CDC report said.

The new study, which appears in February's issue of the journal Pediatrics, involved 163 babies. Most were white, ages 2 to 28 months and living in California, Minnesota and Missouri.

The researchers measured levels of several phthalates in urine from diapers. They also asked the mothers about use in the previous 24 hours of baby products including lotions, powders, diaper creams and baby wipes.

All urine samples had detectable levels of at least one phthalate, and most had levels of several more. The highest levels were linked with shampoos, lotions and powders, and were most prevalent in babies younger than 8 months.

John Bailey, chief scientist at the Personal Care Products Council, questioned the methods and said the phthalates could have come from diapers, lab materials or other sources.

"Unfortunately, the researchers of this study did not test baby care products for the presence of phthalates or control for other possible routes of exposure," Bailey said.

___

Pediatrics: http://www.pediatrics.org

FDA: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/cos-phth.html.com

kusumat
02-04-2008, 02:55 AM
I found the info from the book " Raising Baby Green" by Dr. Alan Greene helpful. It has all info you mentioned and others. It is one of books I wish I read it sooner.

You can also check out the skindeep website by EWG. They tested cosmetic products including the baby ones. I like California Baby(Target) and Earth Mama Angel Baby(Nordstorm).

Kathy

daisymommy
02-04-2008, 10:42 AM
I was coming here to post a link to this study. It's about time that the message started getting out! We switched to natural body products for our whole family about a year ago, when Beth (Brittone) posted about phthalates being in products, and helped educate us on the subject (thanks Beth!).

What really chaps my hide is that it has been established that Phthalates from other products are endocrine/hormone disruptors (such as chewing on a teething ring that contains PVC--a phthalate), but they want to say that they're not sure if it gets into your child's body through their skin--rather than their mouth or breathing it in--is somehow safe and okay, and they aren't sure if it's a problem! Come on people! Get it together! Does that sound like an ostrich with their head in the sand or what?! It really angers me that mainstream scientists and the FDA are not helping get the truth out there to help parents keep their children safe.

I hate to say this, but you can pretty much count on any regular--non natural--body product containing chemicals that are bad for your health. That means Johnson-and-Johnson, Baby Magic, Huggies brand, etc.

The Skin Deep website is fabulous and very helpful for finding safe alternatives. http://www.cosmeticdatabase.com/index.php?nothanks=1

Around here we use:
Burt's Bees Tear Free Shampoo and baby Wash
Burt's Bees Lotion (these both smell deliciously of apricot oil)
California Baby Wash
Rainbow Bubble Bath, Body wash, and hand soap (Whole Foods)

ThreeofUs
02-04-2008, 11:01 AM
What really chaps my hide is that it has been established that Phthalates from other products are endocrine/hormone disruptors (such as chewing on a teething ring that contains PVC--a phthalate), but they want to say that they're not sure if it gets into your child's body through their skin--rather than their mouth or breathing it in--is somehow safe and okay, and they aren't sure if it's a problem!

As a former research chemist, ITA! I quit my career many years ago when I found out how unsafe even labs are.

We, as a society, have been told wildly inaccurate "facts" by industry and government. But it's also true that many of us would rather believe those lies than give up a comfortable, head-in-the-sand existence - and that people who *do* figure things out are labelled "cranks" or worse.

ARRRGGGHHHH!

brittone2
02-04-2008, 11:56 AM
As a former research chemist, ITA! I quit my career many years ago when I found out how unsafe even labs are.

We, as a society, have been told wildly inaccurate "facts" by industry and government. But it's also true that many of us would rather believe those lies than give up a comfortable, head-in-the-sand existence - and that people who *do* figure things out are labelled "cranks" or worse.

ARRRGGGHHHH!

ITA w/ both above PPs. Yet again why I do not trust the CDC and FDA to keep my children safe. I simply don't. The power of lobbyists and big business has long eclipsed our voices as parents. I feel we all need to band together as parents and voters to demand better. Only by disseminating this information and calling upon our leaders and industry to stop putting this stuff in products do we stand even the slightest chance of being heard. It may not happen in our lifetime, but having our concerns overshadowed by the almighty $$ while possibly sacrificing our children's health is just so wrong.

I also agree that phthalates are in almost all conventional baby products, and in 99 percent of cases, you can't even tell by the ingredients because industry is not even forced to include phthalates as an ingredient in their product. They can just lump it in under "fragrance" in the ingredients.

It drives me absolutely bonkers that the FDA, CDC, etc. have acknowledged "we need more research in this area" because there have been studies showing problems. Yet they allow manufacturers to continue to absolutely *load* our babies up with phthalate-containing products in the meantime. What happened to erring on the side of caution, especially when we are talking about *infants* for crying out loud???

Babies do not need phthalates/fragrance, but these companies have convinced us to buy buy buy their products while we slowly pump this stuff into their bloodstream (mostly unknowingly).

End rant. Sorry.

citymama
02-04-2008, 02:36 PM
Original Poster here. Hah, I love that we're all equally (and IMO, rightly) skeptical about the FDA/CPSC et al's ability to protect us and our kids. We're also longtime California Baby users (and similarly careful about grown-up care products/food as well). We eat organic food as much as possible, try and buy made in Europe/USA toys etc etc.

But I'm appalled that kids' safety is an elite prerogative: only something for the tiny percent of people who can a) afford to spend the money and b) do the necessary research, analysis and critical thinking. Kids' safety has got to be an across-the-board priority for the nation (and planet!). Large corporations like J&J, P&G, Mattel and others really need to shoulder more responsibility for what they expose children to. Period.

hellokitty
02-04-2008, 03:26 PM
Ugh, this is all old news, I can't believe the AP is just now doing a story on it. It disgusts me that most americans are in the dark about this. My DH and I are so frustrated at this point with all the crap in our everyday products and foods that we use that sometimes we joke that we should just live off the grid. Grow our own foods, make our own stuff, etc.. Our gov't sucks, I feel like all they are out to do is help corporate america make big $ and they have no qualms about poisoning the general public, while telling them with a smile that everything is ok, when they are the ones passing legislation to let all of these companies get away with this crap! :32:

brittone2
02-04-2008, 03:40 PM
Yeah, old news, but published in the very mainstream journal Pediatrics, so that's a step in the right direction, kwim?

I posted a link to a story newsweek had in last week on Phthalates, BPA, and PBDEs in case anyone missed that and is interested in reading it (it would be a few pages back now). I've also seen phthalates covered in US Today or US Weekend not too long ago. While it saddens me it has taken the mainstream press a *long* time to cover this issue, I feel better that at least some of the information is being pushed out to the masses.

Citymama-ITA w/ you. It almost becomes a very elitist topic, which is sad. The parents that know about it and can afford alternatives are a very select group, which is very unfair to the health of America's children :(
(we're CA Baby users as well ;) That bottle lasts us many months so I consider it well worth the cost).

JBaxter
02-04-2008, 11:25 PM
I wonder why they think its safe to add this crap? We use California baby on Nathan. It it any wonder we have so may illnesses with our babies :(