MarisaSF
07-23-2008, 01:55 AM
I found this article at MSNBC.com to be interesting: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25723984/
We donated DS's cord blood. Our hospital doesn't have its own bank, but Cryobanks sent me a kit and made the donation process pretty easy (http://www.cryo-intl.com/). The article made me feel glad his cord blood could potentially be used to help someone. It also made me feel less guilty about not choosing to privately bank (which could have potentially helped DS or his sister).
From the article:
The vast majority of ... parents — about 97 percent — will do nothing, and the umbilical cord and the cells it contains will be discarded as medical waste.
The tiny fraction that remain, however, will be caught in the sharp debate between private cord blood firms vying to cash in on an estimated $1 billion industry and public registries trying to boost diverse donations to fuel research and save lives in the community at large.
<snip>
Overall, the chance that a publicly stored unit of cord blood will ever be used is about 650 times higher than the odds that a privately banked unit will ever be needed, Confer added.
I don't mean to enter a debate ("sharp" or otherwise :P). I totally understand why someone (especially with a family medical history) would want to privately bank. This article points out the great potential benefits of banking period -- if you don't choose to privately bank, please consider donating!
-Marisa
We donated DS's cord blood. Our hospital doesn't have its own bank, but Cryobanks sent me a kit and made the donation process pretty easy (http://www.cryo-intl.com/). The article made me feel glad his cord blood could potentially be used to help someone. It also made me feel less guilty about not choosing to privately bank (which could have potentially helped DS or his sister).
From the article:
The vast majority of ... parents — about 97 percent — will do nothing, and the umbilical cord and the cells it contains will be discarded as medical waste.
The tiny fraction that remain, however, will be caught in the sharp debate between private cord blood firms vying to cash in on an estimated $1 billion industry and public registries trying to boost diverse donations to fuel research and save lives in the community at large.
<snip>
Overall, the chance that a publicly stored unit of cord blood will ever be used is about 650 times higher than the odds that a privately banked unit will ever be needed, Confer added.
I don't mean to enter a debate ("sharp" or otherwise :P). I totally understand why someone (especially with a family medical history) would want to privately bank. This article points out the great potential benefits of banking period -- if you don't choose to privately bank, please consider donating!
-Marisa