Hawkeyewife
04-24-2009, 02:32 PM
I am pregnant with number four (16 weeks now) and thinking about whether we really need an ultrasound. I had two with my forst two and one with my last one. I am low risk and have been very lucky so far...
Anyway, I am considering not having an u/s done due to the fact that I keep hearing of friends/family be alerted to problems during pregnancy and then having healthy babies (or in my SILs case, the docs thought her baby was hydrocephalic, she had probably a dozen ultrasounds and was scared to death but baby was all right except for the fact that even though they had so many scans they never found that the baby had 12 fingers and 12 toes!)... I would, of course get one if there were a medical reason. I'd rather be rationally ignorant of something than be worried for no reason since it seems like almost everything that can be diagnosed in utero cannot be treated until after birth.
Last but not least, I have read some studies that suggest a correlation of autism with increased use of u/s, though I am not completely convinced of that.
Is anybody else considering not having an ultrasound?
Anyway, I am considering not having an u/s done due to the fact that I keep hearing of friends/family be alerted to problems during pregnancy and then having healthy babies (or in my SILs case, the docs thought her baby was hydrocephalic, she had probably a dozen ultrasounds and was scared to death but baby was all right except for the fact that even though they had so many scans they never found that the baby had 12 fingers and 12 toes!)... I would, of course get one if there were a medical reason. I'd rather be rationally ignorant of something than be worried for no reason since it seems like almost everything that can be diagnosed in utero cannot be treated until after birth.
Last but not least, I have read some studies that suggest a correlation of autism with increased use of u/s, though I am not completely convinced of that.
Is anybody else considering not having an ultrasound?