american_mama
02-17-2014, 02:48 PM
Interesting article.
http://gma.yahoo.com/mother-39-milk-made-order-boys-girls-093247831.html
I wonder a couple things.... in studying the effects of breast milk on humans, do these results mean that donated breast milk should be considered separately than non-donor milk? I'm sure the statistical relevance of this is very low, since few babiesget donor milk, but I've always been curious about variations within feeding categories. For instance, there is pumped breast milk, donor breast milk, frozen breast milk, formula through a SNS and consumed at the breast, etc. I would think there would be some small benefits gained and lost in thse variations.
In terms of non-humans, the article says cows and rhesus monkeys make more milk for female babies, and that the scene for this seems to be set during pregnancy. I wonder if the dairy industry would take note of that and start trying to select female calves in order to get more milk from the mother cows, and what the consequences of that would be.
http://gma.yahoo.com/mother-39-milk-made-order-boys-girls-093247831.html
I wonder a couple things.... in studying the effects of breast milk on humans, do these results mean that donated breast milk should be considered separately than non-donor milk? I'm sure the statistical relevance of this is very low, since few babiesget donor milk, but I've always been curious about variations within feeding categories. For instance, there is pumped breast milk, donor breast milk, frozen breast milk, formula through a SNS and consumed at the breast, etc. I would think there would be some small benefits gained and lost in thse variations.
In terms of non-humans, the article says cows and rhesus monkeys make more milk for female babies, and that the scene for this seems to be set during pregnancy. I wonder if the dairy industry would take note of that and start trying to select female calves in order to get more milk from the mother cows, and what the consequences of that would be.