I voted other. Pre-e meant a c-section 4+ weeks early so I have no idea when I would have gone into labor with my younger son.
Yes, second baby was born earlier in the pregnancy than the first
No, the first baby arrived earlier in the pregnancy than the second
Both were born at roughly the same stage in pregnancy
Other (please say what)
I voted other. Pre-e meant a c-section 4+ weeks early so I have no idea when I would have gone into labor with my younger son.
Katie, mama to a pair of boys.
DS1 - 5 days late
DD - 14 days late
DS2 - 3 days late
Kris
DD1 - 41 weeks
DD2 - 37wks 4 days forcibly evicted due to IUGR
Yep, DS was 8 days late and then induced. My water broke at 36 weeks, 4 days with DD (no labor but was induced).
Sally
My Joyful DS
My Lovely DD
Please excuse the typos. Getting used to a virtual keyboard
DS1 - delivered at exactly 41 weeks after induction
DS2 - spontaneous labour & delivery on his due date, 1 week ealier than the first. Did not expect that at all!
Sweetie Pies, DS 9/2004 & DS 4/2008
This thread is scaring me.
Lori
Mom to Jason 05/05
and Zachary 05/10
DS was 5+ weeks early (so slightly premature).
DD was 1 day shy of her due date (woulda had an awesome birthday if it was on her due date).
I was about 2 weeks late and my lil sis was 2 weeks early.
Baby 1: 35 weeks
Baby 2: 38 weeks
Baby 3: 36H shy of 40 weeks
Caroline, mama to DS 01/03, DD 05/05, DS 04/07
http://littleshoulders.blogspot.com
"Now that you're here, the word of the Lorax seems perfectly clear. UNLESS someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." -- Dr. Seuss
DS and DD1 were both born at exactly 38 weeks. DD2 was born at 38.5. Both girls were c/sections, but I was in labor with them when I had the c/s.