It wouldnt be free, it just wouldnt be from taxed earnings. Furthermore, this prevents women from using an HSA account for cases when its known that the baby will not survive (Trisomy 18?). I understand the pro-life perspective, but in cases where the baby is not going to survive, I dont understand wanting to put a mother through the torment of carrying that pregnancy to term.
ETA: I would also like to point that there are women on this board who have had that experience, of an unviable pregnancy, and its a bit of a slap in the face to term that they just thought the baby was an "inconvenience." Maybe try to keep the cheering to a level thats a little more cognizant of others. I am quite sure we can all express our opinions without slamming others.
Results 1 to 10 of 228
Threaded View
-
03-31-2011 #21
Sapphire level (2000+ posts)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- RDU NC
- Posts
- 2,930
Last edited by WolfpackMom; 03-31-2011 at 12:48 PM.
DS 1/10 "boo-boo"
Reply With Quote