Originally Posted by
Kestrel
If the house is old, in a crappy neighborhood (think Detroit after the auto crash), in poor repair, or otherwise a problem, the mortgage holder may not want it; especially if back taxes are owed. In general, tax liens must be paid off first. So, if the taxes continue to accrue and not get paid, eventually it will be repo'd for back taxes and the mortgage holder will write off the loss. If the mortgage holder takes possession, they are responsible for taxes and upkeep.
Keep in mind I'm talking very general, but let me throw out some numbers to make it easier to understand. Let's say the house is worth $100K for its age and in good repair. However, there is $15K is back taxes, and repair issues in the house that will take $25 to fix (roof leak, mold issue, fire damage, water leak, whatever; or simply so old/worn that it needs extensive remodeling). Repos in general sell for less than owner-sales, just because. The mortgage holder will not put any money into the house to fix it, at all. So a house that might sell for the $100K will sell for more like $60, to someone with a cash deal willing to take on the project. The selling owner would then have to pay off the back taxes and utilities in order to complete the sale. After doing all this, and paying the agent, upkeep, title, closing costs, ect, as well as the cost of the mortgage holder's staff and their costs - would there be enough of the $60K sale price left to cover the debt paid to SIL? Sometimes, the mortgage holder decides it's better off to just write off the loss, do nothing, and left the taxman eventually take it.
BUT - remember I'm talking worst case here! Call the mortgage holder, if the debt is as close to the value as you think, they will most likely take the keys. But the longer you wait, the more the debt grows, and the less likely that is. It will take time to go through the process, and if there is no heat in the home, you want this DONE before the weather gets cold.