
Originally Posted by
Liziz
I'm so excited for you to take this trip!
DH and I are also looking at going to Europe this summer, and our goal is to be there at least/around 2 weeks. Any shorter and it seems like the $$ for plane tickets isn't worth it (or is painful!), and while we'd love to go longer, we feel like much longer is too taxing to the grandparents who will be watching our DC.
In terms of how many places to visit -- it's all about how YOU want to travel. I get the impression that this is a once-in-a-great-while trip for you guys (as in, you're not planning to go back to Europe every summer). As such, if it were me, I'd do the whirlwind trip and hit up each of the places you'd like to see, even if only for a few days. There are several locations in Europe that I've been able to visit for only a short time. There are places I wish I could have spent more time at (and would love to go back if I could!), but I don't regret getting a little bit of time there! For example, I've been to Paris, but only had 1.5 days to explore the city. I definitely would have loved to spend a lot more time (and had to pass up some things I really wanted to see, like the Louvre) -- but, I 100% feel the time I had was worth it and have no regrets that I was there! You'll just have to really prioritize what sights you want to see in each place.
When we were traveling in Europe (2016-2019) we found it almost always better for us to either drive or fly between big cities -- trains were great but often added a lot of time to the trip. (To note: it's never worth it to try to drive IN the big cities, but driving TO them is what we'd do sometimes). I've heard anecdotally from friends living there more recently though that air travel is more of a mess these days though, so I'm not sure if this is still good advice. Definitely worth comparing options, though.